Environmental Litigation Clinic
About the Clinic
The Environmental Litigation Clinic at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at 91视频 represents public interest environmental groups bringing citizen enforcement actions in state and federal courts on a variety of environmental and land use issues, including water pollution, compliance with environmental review requirements, and cleanup of toxic sites. These citizen suits are the last line of defense in protecting the environment and also serve to compel EPA and state environmental agencies to do the job they are required to do to protect the environment. Law students working under the supervision of a law school professor represent clinic clients in various aspects of legal work, which may include researching and developing cases, drafting litigation papers, appearing in court, and preparing for and conducting hearings.
The Clinic is actively expanding its range of work beyond Clean Water Act cases for its primary client ., a non-profit dedicated to protecting the Hudson River and its tributaries. In that effort, the Clinic takes on several new qualifying clients each year, which can range from very small, local community organizations through well-established, not-for-profit environmental groups.
Student Participation
Under Faculty supervision, students represent clinic clients in various aspects of legal work, which may include researching and developing cases, drafting litigation papers, appearing in court, and preparing for and conducting hearings. Student interns practice under the JJLS student practice order, representing our clients in litigation against polluters seeking to enforce environmental laws, or against the EPA or New York DEC seeking to force the agencies to comply with their obligations under the law. They will be responsible for all aspects of ongoing or potential environmental cases on behalf of not-for-profit environmental groups such as Riverkeeper, NRDC, and small local advocacy groups. Interns will counsel clients about the cases and legal strategy, draft complaints, motions and memoranda of law as needed, and, when necessary, appear in New York state court.
In addition to the case work, the weekly seminar focuses on substantive environmental law and on lawyering skills encountered in major civil litigation. Skill areas include case planning, integration of facts and law, client counseling, negotiation, drafting legal documents, and pretrial and trial advocacy.
-
takes care of the river so that there are always plenty of fish and the water is clean and safe for everyone who lives around it. To date, Riverkeeper and its network of citizens have prosecuted over 100 environmental lawbreakers.
is the umbrella organization for the more than 80 Waterkeeper programs located throughout North and Central America. The Waterkeeper movement is among the fastest growing grass-roots environmental movements and quickly is becoming a unique force for environmental change. It is an environmental "neighborhood watch" program, a citizen's patrol to protect communities and the waters they depend on. The Keeper philosophy is based on the notion that the protection and enjoyment of a community's natural resources requires the daily vigilance of its citizens.
-
Update On Closing Down Norlite Hazardous Waste Incinerator
May 28, 2024
Professor Todd Ommen, Director of the 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic, discusses DEC's efforts to reclassify Norlite's fly ash as hazardous waste with Mark Dunlea for (), addressing the environmental and community impacts of Norlite's operations and comes in the wake of Norlite's recent shutdown and worker layoffs.
In 2022, the Clinic filed a Motion to Intervene in the State of NY and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation v. Norlite, LLC on behalf of Lights Out Norlite in the Supreme Court of New York Albany County. Lights Out Norlite aims to sue Norlite Facility for its members' prolonged exposure to harmful air contaminants and challenge DEC's enforcement inaction, citing violations of constitutional rights under the Green Amendment.
The Norlite Facility, an aggregate production and hazardous waste incineration facility, has long plagued the community in Cohoes, NY through its emission of harmful pollutants. Nearby residents are severely impacted by the Facility鈥檚 production of fugitive dust emissions, which blanket their homes, cars, and other property in a sheet of dust. The air contaminants in this dust significantly increase the risk of adverse health effects in the surrounding communities.
Norlite Decision
June 22, 2023
New York Supreme Court in Albany County has granted the motion to intervene filed by the Clinic in a groundbreaking Green Amendment action regarding a hazardous waste incinerator in upstate New York. The Clinic brought claims on behalf of Lights Out Norlite and local residents, arguing that the Norlite facility 鈥 which has been repeatedly fined over the past two decades 鈥 cannot be operated in a way that protects the health and environment of the residents, including an environmental justice neighborhood directly adjacent to the facility. The Court granted the motion to intervene, rejecting both Norlite鈥檚 and DEC鈥檚 arguments that intervention was unnecessary or prejudicial. As the Court states, the fact that DEC claims it 鈥溾榓lready seeks to protect the rights of the intervenors to clean air and a healthful environment鈥 cannot be considered an adequate substitute for the intervenors' Green Amendment claim, especially in light of DEC's enforcement history against Norlite, and certainly cannot be a basis upon which this Court denies their intervention.鈥
Nitrogen Pollution in Suffolk County
October 10, 2023
Clinic intern Joe Beletti-Naccarato drafted a letter on behalf of Save the Sound, Group for the East End, and Peconic Bay Keeper, which was presented to the Suffolk County Legislature at their General Meeting. The Letter detailed how Suffolk County鈥檚 inaction in addressing pervasive nitrogen pollution violated county residents鈥 Green Amendment rights by depriving them of clean water and a healthful environment. For decades nitrogen pollution from septic systems and cesspools has contaminated the groundwater which serves as the county鈥檚 sole source of drinking water and caused harmful algal blooms in surface waters destroying ecological communities and the local shellfish industry. The letter called for Suffolk County to take expedient actions to address these issues including voting to fund a program the County proposed but has since refused to implement, which would improve septic systems in the county as well as expand sewer infrastructure and prohibit the permitting of new septic systems that do not filter out nitrogen.
Letter to Suffolk County (PDF)
Lights Out Norlite
December 20, 2022
The Clinic filed a Motion to Intervene in the State of NY and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation v. Norlite, LLC on behalf of Lights Out Norlite in the Supreme Court of New York Albany County. Lights Out Norlite seeks to intervene in the State case to sue the Norlite Facility for its members鈥 decade-long exposure to harmful air contaminants. Lights Out Norlite also seeks to challenge DEC鈥檚 lack of enforcement action with regard to the Facility as a violation of its members鈥 constitutional rights to clean air and a healthful environment, pursuant to the recently enacted Green Amendment.
The Norlite Facility, an aggregate production and hazardous waste incineration facility, has long plagued the community in Cohoes, NY through its emission of harmful pollutants. Nearby residents are severely impacted by the Facility鈥檚 production of fugitive dust emissions, which blanket their homes, cars, and other property in a sheet of dust. The air contaminants in this dust significantly increase the risk of adverse health effects in the surrounding communities. Despite voicing their grievances to DEC for years, DEC has only issued mere slaps on the wrist in the form of penalties. Lights Out Norlite through its motion to intervene seeks to ensure that the proper remedy is awarded 鈥 the immediate and proper closure of this Facility.
Saratoga Biochar
September 26, 2022
The clinic filed an Article 78 Petition on behalf of Clean Air Action Network, challenging the Town of Moreau Planning Board's approval of a site plan via a Negative Declaration to build a facility that would burn sewage to produce carbon fertilizer. The Planning Board approved this facility without independent study of the many potential negative environmental impacts, despite the fact that this would be the first facility of its kind in New York and in violation of SEQRA. Intern Megan Gaddy prepared the documents, and the case is currently pending in the Saratoga County Supreme Court.
Saratoga Biochar Petition (PDF)
Second Avenue Apartments
July 2, 2022
In 2020, the citizens of Troy were introduced to an apartment complex project that would destroy forest land and animal habitat on the outskirts of Troy. This parcel of land constitutes the last untouched forest along the Hudson River within the City of Troy and is of high historical, archeological, and cultural significance due to its sacredness to local Indigenous peoples. On July 2, the Clinic filed an Article 78 petition challenging two decisions by the Troy City Council relating to this potential apartment complex development. First, the decision to rezone the particular parcel of land for the purposes of allowing the apartment complex development and second, the decision by the Council to declare a Negative Declaration and concluding there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the rezoning decision. Legal intern, Logan O鈥機onnell, prepared the papers and the case is currently pending in the NYS Rensselaer County Supreme Court.
Second Avenue Apartments Petition (PDF)
Friends of the Shawangunks
June 26, 2022
91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic filed an Article 78 petition on behalf of the not for profit Friends of the Shawangunks challenging the Town of Gardiner Planning Board鈥檚 approval of a special use permit construction of a home in a highly ecologically sensitive zoning district within the Shawangunk Ridge Protection Area. Due to the fragile ecosystem, Gardiner Town Code requires individuals to develop at the lowest possible elevation on their property to protect the ecosystems at higher elevations. The Clinic aims to prove that the Planning Board鈥檚 decision to approve the special use permit in violation of the unambiguous Town Code is arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law. Intern Daniel Krupa prepared the documents, and the case is currently pending in the Ulster County Supreme Court.
Friends of the Shawangunks Petition (PDF)
Friends of Wickers Creek Archeological Site
March 22, 2022
The Clinic has put the final nail in the coffin of a Homeowners Association鈥檚 attempt to prevent access to a conservation easement created to protect and honor an historic Native American site. On behalf of the not-for-profit , the Clinic sued the HOA back in 2017. We defeated a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, and won our own motion for summary judgment. The Clinic then briefed and won in the Appellate Division when the HOA appealed. Finally, the HOA sought leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals, which the Clinic opposed. On March 22, 2022, the Court of Appeals agreed with us and denied the motion, finally ending the litigation in favor of FOWCAS.
White Lake
March 15, 2022
The Clinic filed this Petition (PDF) on behalf of the Adirondack White Lake Association and Protect the Adirondacks!, challenging the Adirondack Park Agency鈥檚 13 year-long refusal to hold any adjudicatory hearings on permit applications. The permit at issue was granted to a mining company to mine granite in a residential and recreational area next to the pristine White Lake. The permit was approved despite serious unresolved questions regarding noise impacts, legal access to the site, and other environmental impacts. The APA鈥檚 refusal to hold a hearing on these issues, despite a clear regulatory mandate, was arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law.
January 11, 2022
The Clinic submitted comments to the Adirondack Park Agency on behalf of our clients Protect the Adirondacks! and Adirondack White Lake Association. The comments urged the APA to conduct an adjudicative hearing on a permit application to revive a 100-year old mine next to the pristine White Lake and dozens of residences, and turn the mine into a stone quarry. Despite a clear legal duty to do so, the APA has not held an adjudicatory hearing in over 10 years, a dereliction that is particularly troubling given that the APA lacks the authority to deny a permit without such a hearing. As set forth in the comments, this quarry project is moving forward at full speed despite the lack of a sufficient review of the environmental impacts. The meeting to discuss the application will be held on January 13, 2022.
Constitution Pipeline
November 19, 2021
The Clinic, alongside co-counsel and former clinician Anne Marie Garti, has finally killed the Constitution Pipeline once and for all on behalf of our client Stop the Pipeline. After years of back-and-forth litigation over the initial order approving the pipeline, eminent domain proceedings and the water quality certification denial by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation, the pipeline pulled the plug. Now, based on Stop the Pipeline鈥檚 arguments, the Second Circuit has vacated the underlying orders approving the pipeline. Barring an unlikely successful appeal, this kills the project once and for all.
Article: 2nd Circuit Kills All Approvals for $683M NY Pipeline (PDF)
LaGuardia AirTrain Project
September 20th, 2021
On behalf of community and environmental groups Riverkeeper, Inc., Guardians of Flushing Bay, and Ditmar Block Association, the 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic 鈥媐iled a petition for review in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging the FAA's ROD for the LaGuardia AirTrain project. The petition alleges that the FAA impermissibly constrained their environmental review, arbitrarily excluding alternatives in order to push through their desired outcome and ignoring cumulative impacts of the project. Despite their own initial critiques of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey鈥檚 plans for the project, none of their original concerns were addressed in the deficient EIS. The FAA sped through the environmental review process under political pressure despite the risk of harm to communities of color and low income communities in the area.
Petition for Review (PDF)
Article:Sierra Club Amicus Brief
May 4, 2021
The 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic represented Sierra Club in submitting an amicus brief in support of Protect the Adirondacks in a vitally important case before New York鈥檚 highest court. The case centered around New York鈥檚 unique constitutional provision keeping the state's forest preserve 鈥渇orever wild.鈥 The court adopted the interpretation of that clause advocated by Sierra Club and others that the clause must be read as a singular command, and forbids cutting down thousands of trees for snowmobile trails. This was a huge win for the natural state of the Adirondacks.
Sane Energy - Petition
March 18, 2021
The 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic filed a Petition on behalf of Sane Energy Project and several local residents near a proposed expansion of a National Grid natural gas facility. As alleged in the Petition, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation made the incredible determination that a proposed expansion, which includes a greater than 30% increase in emissions, the construction of a massive new pipeline, and approvals from FDNY to truck natural gas over New York City bridges and through the neighborhood posed no potential environmental impacts and need not undergo an environmental review. This determination was arbitrary, capricious and contrary to multiple laws, and the Petition seeks to vacate it. The case was briefed and argued at a public hearing by clinic intern Claire McLeod.
Article: National Grid, Regulator Slammed With Lawsuit by Brooklyn Residents (bkreader.com) -
Friends of Evelyn Williams Award
October 27, 2012
Presented by Kentuckians for the Commonwealth to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic to honor KFTC鈥檚 allies who worked so diligently to win the important, groundbreaking settlement with ICGCertificate of Appreciation
May 26, 2010
Presented by the City of New York Brooklyn Community Board Five to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic in recognition of outstanding Community ServiceTheodore Gordon Flyfishers (TGF) Conservation Award
2008
Awarded by the Theodore Gordon Flyfishers to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic, who, through the strong leadership of its Directors and the tireless efforts and commitment of the many law students who have worked on the numerous challenging causes of the angling and environmental communities over the years, has shown that environmental justice is obtainableProfessional Resource Award
September 20, 2003
Presented by New York State Council of Trout Unlimited to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic, Karl Coplan and Robert Kennedy, Jr. Expression of gratitude and appreciation to Karl Coplan, Bobby Kennedy, and the interns that have and will assist in litigation to insure the protection of our coldwater resources and their environments.The 12th Annual Manhattan Award
May 25, 2000
Presented to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic for its spirit of excellence, compassion, and unique contribution to the cityJacques Sartisky Peace Award
February 15, 2000
Presented by the Professional鈥檚 Network for Social Responsibility to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic in the spirit of Jack鈥檚 lifelong commitment to the preservation of our planet for outstanding work in protecting New York Waterways and the environment.Hamilton Avenue Hunter Street Neighborhood Association Award
June 1999
Presented by the Hamilton Avenue Hunter Street Neighborhood Association to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic with deep appreciation for the enormous amount of time, effort and legal talent contributed to their cause, and for bringing their case to a successful conclusion.First Annual Beczak Environmental Education Award
April 1998
Presented to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic and the Riverkeeper for unique and irreplaceable contributions to the people of the Hudson River Valley.Thomas Berry Environmental Award
October 3, 1997
Presented by the College of Mount Saint Vincent to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Esq. and the 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic in Recognition of his Outstanding Record of Promoting and Protecting Our EnvironmentThe Brave 40 Award
October 3, 1997
Presented to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic in Recognition Of Their Tireless Efforts and Unwavering Support for the New York City Department of Environmental Protection Police.Battle of Spruce Hill Award
Presented to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic for their United Effort In Bringing Back The Spruce Hill Brook
Environmental Quality Award
April 24, 1997
Presented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II to 91视频 Environmental Litigation Clinic for Protecting and Enhancing Environmental Quality.